From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,365c587e3030d8f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Win32Ada
Date: 1998/11/14
Message-ID: <364d01ba.39823004@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 411686766
References: <72as14$bh4$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>
 <01be0e3b$a980c340$5da65c8b@aptiva> <72ev6o$gn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <364BE12F.F38A285C@cts.com> <72iodh$9gq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>technologies that the government has directly and
>indirectly funded, and most of those stay *completely*
>proprietary
  I understand there was some wording in a recent bill that allows
Freedom of Information Act access to university research etc that used
to be disclosed only by the investigator or the granting agency.
Anbody know how that might affect software development in the future?