From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,365c587e3030d8f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dave Wood <dpw@cts.com>
Subject: Re: Win32Ada
Date: 1998/11/15
Message-ID: <364E9C4A.E6F28A9F@cts.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 412019488
Cache-Post-Path: wagasa.cts.com!unknown@arniek.cts.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <72as14$bh4$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>
 <01be0e3b$a980c340$5da65c8b@aptiva> <72ev6o$gn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <364BE12F.F38A285C@cts.com> <72ineu$8m1$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Deja Vous Productions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: dpw@cts.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewarr@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> 
> In article <364BE12F.F38A285C@cts.com>,
>   dpw@cts.com wrote:
> 
> > More specifically, distribution requires the licensee to
> > also license the Microsoft SDK, which is why we are able
> > to bundle it with ObjectAda.
> 
> The version that is generally available contains no such
> permission. It requires that USE of the binding require
> that you also use the SDK, but at least the version I have
> access to says nothing about such distribution permission.
> Can one assume that this is a special deal that Aonix
> specifically made with Microsoft, or are you just assuming
> that it is OK to distribute if you are sure users will be
> properly licensed to use the bindings. On the face of it
> the copyright is exactly that, a copyright that prohibits
> copying.

Yes, we have the necessary licensing arrangements
in place.

-- Dave Wood, Aonix
-- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows
-- http://www.aonix.com