From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3c37d6ac44550e08,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: al johnston Subject: ??? Help!: how to do unconstraned arrays/records??? Date: 1998/11/04 Message-ID: <36407C96.731EEB90@avionics2.robins.af.mil>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 408343974 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Robins AFB, GA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: HELP!!!! I a trying to convert the following "static" ada data structure to a structure that can be created dynamically, ie via the "new" ada function, and setting the two constrants at that time. I can not seem to find anything that will work (as far as type declarations) short of moving the second level array (Host_array) into the top level structure (system_config_type) and making it 2d. That is TOO ugly!!!! Can one of you ada guru's help me out? the current type definitions (ie the "static" version) are below.... thanks!!!! -al ------------------------------------------------------------- NUMBER_OF_HOST_WIDGETS : Integer := some bound; NUMBER_OF_NODE_WIDGETS : Integer := some other bound; type Host_Config_Typ is record ID : Integer; Label : String; end record; type Host_Array is array (natural range <>) of Host_Config_Typ; type Node_Config_Typ is record ID : integer; Label : String; Number_of_hosts : Natural := 0; Hosts : Host_Array(1..NUMBER_OF_HOSTS_WIDGETS); end record; type Node_Array is array (natural rangee <>) of Node_Config_Typ; type System_Config_Typ is record Number_of_nodes : Natural := 0; Nodes : Node_Array(NUMBER_OF_NODE_WIDGETS); end record; Config : System_Config_Typ;