From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc49a313eae2d45b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Geoff Bull Subject: Re: Ada and C++ Date: 1998/10/23 Message-ID: <362FC095.A2280414@acenet.com.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 404099071 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <70gn22$594$1@nw003t.infi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@telstra.net X-Trace: nsw.nnrp.telstra.net 909099869 203.35.118.1 (Fri, 23 Oct 1998 09:44:29 EST) Organization: Telstra Big Pond Direct MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 09:44:29 EST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Srinivasan, R (gitas@roanoke.infi.net) wrote: > > : Has anyone got a Win NT setup where they are using gnat and c++? I am > : attempting using gnu win32 beta b19 and gnat 3.10p. Any advise/directions > : would be deeply appreciated. > Is there is a good reason the standard gnat binary distributions come without C++ built? This makes it harder to introduce Ada by stealth! It also means that someone who must have C++ but would LIKE Ada might just give up on the latter rather than try make two versions of gcc coexist.