From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: f753e,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gidf753e,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 14e27f,d4b3d171336fca98
X-Google-Attributes: gid14e27f,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,d4b3d171336fca98
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,544c98121879c710
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ell@access.digex.net (Ell)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.object.moderated moderated
Date: 1998/10/14
Message-ID: <36292c7c.20428244@news.erols.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 400870118
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <907918039.22235@isc.org> <36237050.278941@news.erols.com>
 <3623921A.CD61B9E4@objectshare.com>
 <eZMU1.641$zi4.206438474@newsreader.digex.net>
 <Pine.OSF.4.05.9810140616400.10821-100000@fatcat.dstc.edu.au>
 <8zPU1.660$zi4.293929060@newsreader.digex.net>
 <j5RU1.1366$lU3.822832@news.teleport.com> <3624186A.92B91CA7@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
X-Trace: autumn.news.rcn.net 908340794 5741 207.172.182.90 (14 Oct 1998
 04:53:14 GMT)
Organization: Universe
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: ell@access.digex.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Oct 1998 04:53:14 GMT
Newsgroups: 
 comp.object,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.ada,comp.object.corba,comp.software-eng,news.groups.news.announce.newsgroups
Date: 1998-10-14T04:53:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@earthlink.net> wrote:

> In comp.object Ell <ell@access2.digex.net> wrote:
>> 
>> You elided the part where I quoted from the RFD that one-upsmanship will

>Even though this is about the organization of newsgroups, and how they
>should be run, this thread is one of the stronger agruments in favor of
>moderation that I have seen.  There seems to be no commonly agreeable
>upon method of halting the discussion.

I guess you feel that no one should be opposing the RFD?  Sorry to
upset your world, but not everyone agrees there should be a moderated
group.

Elliott
--
                :=***=:   VOTE  NO  TO  MODERATION!   :=***=: 
CRAFTISM SHOULD NOT USE USENET RESOURCES TO AVOID CRITICISM!
              MODERATORS SHOULD NOT HAVE LIFETIME TERMS!
        :=***=:  Objective  *  Pre-code Modelling  *  Holistic  :=***=:
                      Hallmarks of the best SW Engineering
  Study Phony Crafite OO vs. Genuine OO: http://www.access.digex.net/~ell
    Copyright 1998 Elliott. exclusive of others' writing. may be copied
      without permission only in the comp.* usenet and bitnet groups.