From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed6a891101ff4e06 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mats Weber Subject: Re: Freeing Pointers to classwide types Date: 1998/10/12 Message-ID: <36222676.182518AA@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 400280700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1ftmFTC69GA.191@samson.airnet.net> <360b26a1.41575272@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net> <01bde866$1be8ed00$5330ea9e@UKP014459.logica.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: ELCA Matrix SA Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-10-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew Heaney wrote: > No. When you leave a frame in which an access type is declared, the > storage associated with the access type gets reclaimed automatically. I am almost sure that this is not required by the standard.