From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <36212a7b-deab-45d9-ac45-aa29cd90c7bc@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <8r86vgFc3uU1@mid.individual.net> <iimrem$udn$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <19fh1chm74f9.11cws0j5bckze.dlg@40tude.net>
 <fa33fca1-c95b-4558-8a4c-7b3276366ffc@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d4ff70e$0$6886$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <737a6396-72bd-4a1e-8895-7d50f287960e@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <eda00084-fcc3-416c-bd3e-8b9e9c1a4b40@o13g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <db60098c-2569-4efb-aa81-253ba53686b4@y26g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <iis37l$t09$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <4d51905c$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.151.164
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297195870 17658 127.0.0.1 (8 Feb 2011 20:11:10
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 20:11:10 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.151.164;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17995
Date: 2011-02-08T12:11:10-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 8, 11:47=A0am, Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> wrote:
> On 2/8/2011 1:30 PM, Jeffrey Carter wrote:> I once worked on an Ada proje=
ct that had been done by C people.
>
> =A0> The package specs were badly formatted collections of declarations> =
with no comments; the developers viewed them as header files that
>
> =A0> no one would read. There were minimal comments in the bodies, and> e=
veryone was expected to read the body code to understand how to
>
> =A0> use the operations.
>
> Ah, now I understand. No true Scotsman would write bad Ada!

No, that's not it.
What is 'it' is that the C programmers treated Ada as if it were C and
the result was, as expected, bad Ada.

The reverse is less true, I think.
If you give an Ada Programmer a "must do" in C, AND he applied the
theory/ideology of Ada {specifically contract enforcement & rejection/
culling of bad values}, then the result would NOT be "bad C"... would
it?