From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:49c4:: with SMTP id
 e65-v6mr946427itd.35.1523719710218;
        Sat, 14 Apr 2018 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5888:: with SMTP id x8-v6mr197487otg.0.1523719710095;
 Sat, 14 Apr 2018 08:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k65-v6no1167845ita.0!news-out.google.com!15-v6ni1411itg.0!nntp.google.com!e130-v6no1151558itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 08:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <874lkeojjd.fsf@nightsong.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <f5ac66b2-876f-41f5-8281-6964b41dc718@googlegroups.com>
 <1388442297.545342755.856911.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <5aea61e5-e795-4391-bcb6-4ba956cea394@googlegroups.com>
 <874lkeojjd.fsf@nightsong.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <360c95eb-0cec-4d42-b4df-7bbacd47a592@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada-WinRT bindings - Alpha release
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 15:28:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1847
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1646858879
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51502
Date: 2018-04-14T08:28:29-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 13 April 2018 22:58:48 UTC+1, Paul Rubin  wrote:

> > (while this bindings library would be re-licensed as LGPLv3).
> 
> I can't speak for Alex but as an occasional author of GPL code myself, I
> can tell you that (from my end) requests for re-licensing are taken more
> seriously when they are accompanied by offers of development funding.

I have no problem with GPL for APPLICATIONS. But licensing a library with it is stupid and limiting.

I do all libs in other licences because I want people to use them.