From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ffce418d7a49585f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-22 18:46:23 PST
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!psinntp!cmcl2!lab.ultra.nyu.edu!kenner
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Vendor bashing? Sort of.
Date: 22 Sep 1994 22:11:45 GMT
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Message-ID: <35svf1$77i@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>
References: <35isfn$pqd@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <35j1u5$re1@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <35sc7p$78v@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lab.ultra.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-09-22T22:11:45+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <35sc7p$78v@felix.seas.gwu.edu> mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) writes:
>No, all I said is that the proponents of M2 and M3 were never timid
>about trying to create enthusiasm (markets, if you will). The jury is
>out on M3; we'll see what happens as the GNU M3 front end matures.

Just FYI: From what I understand the GNU M3 front end currently being
developed is meant as a research tool and should not be viewed in the
same manner as the other GCC front ends (C, C++, Objective-C, GNAT,
Pascal, Chill, and Fortran).