From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,55603c56db8d8307 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-21 14:18:14 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fibonacci Numbers? Date: 20 Sep 1994 19:57:26 -0500 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Message-ID: <35o0dm$32o@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <35fl28$1h3@garuda.csulb.edu> <35n2ec$5ng@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Date: 1994-09-20T19:57:26-05:00 List-Id: In article <35n2ec$5ng@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, Robert Dewar wrote: >Keith, I can't believe you would make such a mistake, 34 indeed, doesn't >everyone know that THE ANSWER is 42. > (Raising hand, waving frantically) I do! I do! :-) >By the way, I have a suggestion. When people >ask a truly elementary question, defined as one which >we can pretty much assume that all the readers of the newsgroup know the >answer to, then it's probably better to EMAIL responses, we have now had >half a dozen posts giving the formula for Fibonacci numbers, which is not >very enlightening. > Better still, it amazes me that nobody said, "Um, was this problem assigned for a programming project?" It just seemed so damn basic to me. Of course, Rob E.'s clever algorithm was interesting (yeah, yeah, I'm sure it can be found in any NM cookbook :-) >Now if someone knows the question to which 42 is the answer, that would >be really interesting and worth posting, though probably not to this >newsgroup. > Yup...maybe I should set Followup To to "alt.fan.douglas-adams" :-) -- Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2) ||This is not your Ada 9X -- It doesn't suck || father's Ada For all sorts of interesting Ada 9X tidbits, run the command:||________________ "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.) ObNitPick: Spelling Ada as ADA is like spelling C++ as CPLUSPLUS. :-)