From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,e6b1cf34db426ecb X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6b1cf34db426ecb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,e6b1cf34db426ecb X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,e6b1cf34db426ecb X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: lewando@ibm.net (Andrzej Lewandowski) Subject: Re: Unsolicited email from Ian Joyner Date: 1998/09/16 Message-ID: <35ffa286.0@news3.ibm.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 391677284 References: <360cc371.316005511@news.alt.net> <35FF2D65.63A643AE@mpce.mq.edu.au> X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net X-Trace: 16 Sep 1998 11:35:34 GMT, 32.100.104.172 Organization: IBM.NET Reply-To: lewando@ibm.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ian Joyner wrote: >cjames@cec-services.com wrote: >>Subject: >> Unsolicited email from Ian Joyner >This is an interesting definition of "unsolicited". If you post on a newsgroup, >then you are bound to get replies, either personally or in the newsgroup itself. >As you were abusive, I chose to keep it personal, and not waste everybody else's >time. My mail was reasonably polite. >>Organization: >> Robert C. Martin and Ian Joyner are paranoid assholes >It is an observation in life that those who make accusations of this type are >usually exactly what they are accusing others of. I cannot understand your All this is really interesting. Exciting. Clever. BUT WHY DO YOU POST THIS CRAP TO 4 PROFESSIONAL GROUPS??? Gentleman - back to the kindergarden with your "discussion". A.L.