From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,efe381d5ed2da234 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: aschwarz@acm.org (skidmarks) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Pointer Problem Date: 10 Oct 2004 11:01:39 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <35f054ea.0410101001.4511da74@posting.google.com> References: <7KadnU33z-bmpsLcRVn-og@megapath.net> <35f054ea.0410060743.7b73aac3@posting.google.com> <35f054ea.0410071045.58d3e9af@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.72.61.140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1097431300 29311 127.0.0.1 (10 Oct 2004 18:01:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5003 Date: 2004-10-10T11:01:39-07:00 List-Id: Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote in message news:... > Are you sure? Did you check it, or is it just hear-say? Any decent Ada > compiler would not pass big structures by copy. > Moreover, access parameters might be a better solution than heap allocati > on. Again I apologize for not doing the actual research. We are using an ICC Compiler targeted to the i960. The compiler vintage I don't know, but the initial use was about 1990. I will personally check this claim and verify it's correctness. Sloppy of me not to do it at first blush. However, the use of pointers is independent of the failure of reasonable argument passage. I believe that this is (my own) red herring thrown in with an excess of self-rightous zeal. Sorry.