From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b5fd0c8f03e0168
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Assignment of Classwide Types
Date: 1998/09/04
Message-ID: <35ef2cd9.28712467@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 387664370
References: <6smnns$2vj$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

If Parent_Type is really abstract as you say, then clearly PTR2 cannot
possibly be a pointer to something of Parent_Type, so PTR2.all cannot
exist.  But you also say there's something about finalize and
adjust...
  Are you sure your message didn't leave something out?