From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,992e84f408e149d8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: How to initiate part of a string?
Date: 1998/08/26
Message-ID: <35e45c89.12901035@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 385017918
References: <35E171AB.75CD@ddre.dk>
 <35e2dc46.1973509@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>
 <m37lzx3q8l.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>
 <35e3675e.37587430@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>
 <EACHUS.98Aug26113416@spectre.mitre.org>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-08-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>  Txt : String(1 .. 100) := (1 ..  27=>' ') & "abcd" & (32 .. 100=>' ');
vs
>    Txt : String(1 .. 100) := (1 ..  27=>' ') & "abcd" & (1 .. 69=>' ');
The former has the advantage of less error-prone arithmetic required
of the writer or readers of the code.