From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.31.137.210 with SMTP id l201mr10177323vkd.38.1496749626050; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 04:47:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.84.36 with SMTP id j36mr585414oth.9.1496749626007; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 04:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!y44no627736qth.1!news-out.google.com!m134ni7107itb.0!nntp.google.com!67no1555513itx.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 04:47:05 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2407:7000:9005:4020:a8f7:30ad:5b15:cf95; posting-account=g6PEmwoAAADhFsmVm6Epjviaw4MLU0b5 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2407:7000:9005:4020:a8f7:30ad:5b15:cf95 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <35c6ac5a-3295-4fa4-8545-ca76c113dde4@googlegroups.com> Subject: Arrays in Ada 2012 From: Anatoly Chernyshev Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:47:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:46896 Date: 2017-06-06T04:47:05-07:00 List-Id: Hello everyone, Consider the following nice Ada 2012 construct: -- procedure test is type a1 is array(1..35,1..35,1..35,1..35,1..35,1..35) of long_long_integer; ab:a1; cnt:long_long_integer:=0; begin for e of ab loop cnt:=cnt+1; e:=cnt; end loop; end test; -- Is there a way (e.g. some attribute) to find the indices of the array for a current e within the cycle above? Suppose, I want to calculate something with the indices, or have an exit condition. Of course, I can always build a standard set of for loops, but I already get addicted to that new concept, so don't want to look back. Thanks in advance.