From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a498aa1404ef5d87
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: ell@access.digex.net (Ell)
Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful
Date: 1998/07/30
Message-ID: <35bffc0c.13402742@news.erols.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 376233987
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <35AE4621.2EBC7F6A@eiffel.com> <6p83vj$657$1@news.intellistor.com>
 <35B79E7D.6068DCDF@eiffel.com> <6pg7fg$qhi$1@news.interlog.com>
 <901533851.20058.0.nnrp-04.9e980ba3@news.demon.co.uk>
 <35be2a94.57352308@netnews.msn.com> <6plvgl$eaf$1@news-1.news.gte.net>
 <35bebe5f.95187031@netnews.msn.com> <6pn9af$hqd$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
 <35BF51A2.B199FDFA@gmv.es> <6poobv$8dn$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
 <35c0edf6.9796817@news.erols.com> <6potrl$9jg$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
X-Trace: winter.news.erols.com 901774511 2036 207.172.44.41 (30 Jul 1998
 04:55:11 GMT)
Organization: Universe
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: ell@access.digex.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org> wrote:

>
>Ell wrote in message <35c0edf6.9796817@news.erols.com>...
>>"Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Juan Carlos Gil Montoro wrote in message <35BF51A2.B199FDFA@gmv.es>...
>
><snip>
>>>>  You'll be happy you did.
>>>>  Fortran 90 and Fortran 95 are modern languages unbeatable (IMHO) in
>>>>their niche.
>>>
>>>
>>>Since you mention it, what would you say is Fortran's niche that the language
>is
>>>unbeatable in filling?  (Serious request for opinion, not yet another language
>>>flame war ignition.)
>>
>>Mathematical calculations.  The science, engineering, business, and
>>other groups requiring large amounts of efficient math processing have
>>overwhelmingly adopted Fortran for decades.
>
>
>Gee, thanks.  I didn't know that.

Next time don't ask.

Elliott
-- 
   :=***=:  Objective  *  Pre-code Modelling  *  Holistic  :=***=:
                 Hallmarks of the best SW Engineering
         "The domain object model is the foundation of OOD."
 Check out SW Modeller vs SW Craftite Central : www.access.digex.net/~ell
   Copyright 1998 Elliott. exclusive of others' writing. may be copied
     without permission only in the comp.* usenet and bitnet groups.