From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: Loryn Jenkins <loryn@s054.aone.net.au>
Subject: Re: Which wastes more time? (Was Re: Software landmines (loops))
Date: 1998/09/08
Message-ID: <35F425E5.1E99EC8B@s054.aone.net.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 388765868
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <l5HC1.6840$wN.1856764@news.giganews.com>
 <6rfra4$rul$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35DBDD24.D003404D@calfp.co.uk>
 <m3ogt3qgca.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> <6sbuod$fra$1@hirame.wwa.com>
 <6sebjr$b69$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6sff74$q0s@gurney.reilly.home>
 <6sh2j5$jnl$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35EC2E5A.16DB6CB1@bigfoot-.com>
 <6sjc0a$1lk$3@news.indigo.ie> <EyoHK2.BD@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>
 <35EFB09E.15412933@s054.aone.net.au> <35f2bd98.40599408@news.erols.com>
 <35F06A58.F968BDE1@s054.aone.net.au> <35f48276.90997557@news.erols.com>
 <35F0C3C9.D1E56FF3@s054.aone.net.au> <6srh67$sj5$1@hirame.wwa.com>
 <35F1C0B9.8A50CEB0@s054.aone.net.au> <6svaju$btl@gurney.reilly.home>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.mel.aone.net.au 905192977 26170 203.12.186.171 (7 Sep 1998
 18:29:37 GMT)
Organization: TekRite Pty Ltd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: loryn@acm.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Sep 1998 18:29:37 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-07T18:29:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> You'll have to make your explanation of this failure more explicit
> for me, I'm afriad.  On the basis of your exposition, below, I
> don't see it.

Between Biju, Thomas and Patrick's responses, I think the situation
should be clarified for you: both what I said, and what I meant (to
say).

Loryn Jenkins