From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Loryn Jenkins Subject: Re: Software landmines (loops) Date: 1998/09/07 Message-ID: <35F30758.79030B75@s054.aone.net.au>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 388506345 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6r9f8h$jtm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6renh8$ga7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6rf59b$2ud$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6rfra4$rul$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35DBDD24.D003404D@calfp.co.uk> <6sbuod$fra$1@hirame.wwa.com> <904556531.666222@miso.it.uq.edu.au> <6sgror$je8$3@news.indigo.ie> <6sh3qn$9p2$1@hirame.wwa.com> <35ece7ee.1489912@news.erols.com> <35ED7082.1889@hfl.tc.faa.gov> <8SeH1.542$495.132579351@newsreader.digex.net> <35EDAC92.538A@hfl.tc.faa.gov> <6sknla$7so$1@hirame.wwa.com> <35F2F058.89D67D24@earthlink.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.mel.aone.net.au 905119619 12631 203.12.186.53 (6 Sep 1998 22:06:59 GMT) Organization: TekRite Pty Ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: loryn@acm.org NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Sep 1998 22:06:59 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-06T22:06:59+00:00 List-Id: > There are different things that multiple returns can be. I feel this > form to be BENEFICIAL, and analogous to the pre-conditions of Eiffel. Eiffel preconditions never alter the control flow. Therefore, I don't think these are analogous. Loryn Jenkins