From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2eaa323f38c88c36,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
Subject: with System still required for address clauses ?
Date: 1998/08/25
Message-ID: <35E2E9D3.73566873@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 384603419
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-08-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

if I have an address clause

   for X'Address use <something>;

do I still need a with clause for System (provided, of course, that I can
write <something> without visibility on System), as was required in Ada 83, or
was this dropped in Ada 95 ? The Ada 83 rule stating this is in RM83 13.5(3).