From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe4dfa1b8acdbe4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Stephen Leake <leakstan@erols.com>
Subject: Re: gnat310p on NT
Date: 1998/08/14
Message-ID: <35D4C134.138C@erols.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 381261160
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <01bdc744$cef04bc0$0e2915c0@w95>
 <0QXRrq2x9GA.123@samson.airnet.net> <6r1f6i$9q6$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com
X-Trace: winter.news.erols.com 903135659 21364 207.172.139.89 (14 Aug 1998
 23:00:59 GMT)
Organization: LeakyStain
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: leakstan@erols.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-08-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dennison@telepath.com wrote:
> 
> 
> I thought gnat didn't do separates. Has this changed?

You may be remembering that GNAT (let's get the capitalization right :)
doesn't separately compile separate units (ie, doesn't produce an object
file). But since 'separate' is Ada syntax, GNAT does it - by compiling
the separate body when the parent body is compiled. At the risk of
sounding heretical, think of 'separate' as '#include'.

-- Stephe