From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a498aa1404ef5d87 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Michael Young Subject: Re: Why C++ is successful Date: 1998/08/08 Message-ID: <35CCDE04.D8400E5D@mcs.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 379267994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <35AE4621.2EBC7F6A@eiffel.com> <6p83vj$657$1@news.intellistor.com> <35B79E7D.6068DCDF@eiffel.com> <6pg7fg$qhi$1@news.interlog.com> <901533851.20058.0.nnrp-04.9e980ba3@news.demon.co.uk> <35be2a94.57352308@netnews.msn.com> <6plvgl$eaf$1@news-1.news.gte.net> <35bebe5f.95187031@netnews.msn.com> <6pmmd7$5t7@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com> <6potqg$auh@drn.newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: MCSNet Services Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-08-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: That's a particularly unfortunate citation. The author, Ian Joyner, demonstrates small understanding of OOP and C++. We can discuss each of his points one by one, if you like, but I believe you'll agree after a cursory reading. Michael. nabbasi@earthlink.net wrote: > > In article <6pmmd7$5t7@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>, John says... > > > My view now is that I would still like to learn C++, but only > >really for interest, from what I know of Ada 95 and C++, Ada 95 certainly > >seems to be the more understandable language and, with the increasing > >size and complexity of software systems which require maintenance, I know > >what I d rather maintain. > > > > you might be interested in this C++ critque (sp?) : > > http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~geldridg/cpp/cppcv3.html > > in particular this section: > > http://www.progsoc.uts.edu.au/~geldridg/cpp/cppcv3/sect3/ > > Nasser