From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b24a190fcdd842e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Lengyel Sandor <hunnia@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how?
Date: 1998/07/09
Message-ID: <35A586EA.A96C71E8@pacbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 370068942
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <6nubua$ocj@drn.newsguy.com> <35a398f2.0@news1.ibm.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Pacific Bell Internet Services
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: hunnia@pacbell.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

vonhend@ibm.net wrote:
>
> =

> It is emphatically not cheaper to build a sizeable application (anythin=
g over
> 100,000 lines of code) in C++.  Even if you take fresh from college C p=
rogrammers,
> train them in Ada programming and the use of Ada-specific software deve=
lopment
> tools, buy new hardware and software, and do all the documentation requ=
ired

> by MIL-STD 2167A, it still costs much less to develop the program in C+=
+. <<<<<<<Typo>>>>>
> =


> The above statement is based not only on my experience (nearly 20 years=
 in
> major aerospace corporations) but on those of colleagues who have manag=
ed
> a variety of large and small software projects for said aerospace corpo=
rations.
> =

> Mark Von Hendy, Sr. Scientific Programmer/Analyst
> Lockheed Martin Technical Operations
> =



-- =

 Lengyel S=E1ndor

Hass, alkoss, gyarapits,
S a haza f=E9nyre der=FCl. (K=F6lcsey)