From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,da8fecd51414cd54
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: warning: cannot return a local value by reference
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 10:23:28 +0200
Organization: AdaCL
Message-ID: <3595768.JMpgFWyRs6@linux1.krischik.com>
References: <40be5080$0$9181$626a14ce@news.free.fr>
Reply-To: krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1086252800 01 8089 KuA9GCblGOPGSJev 040603 08:53:20
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: ZZQAWsZBrepCvDdn1R1dQqwPMnULhPCy2N-AHrO6GvDc7dwE0TwowN
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.7
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1059
Date: 2004-06-03T10:23:28+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

k_leau wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I am new to Ada programming and I have the following problem:
> 
> I am using the APQ binding for working with Postgresql.
> 
> I have created the following spec "item_dbm_cls.ads" with the following:
> 
> with item_cls, apq.postgresql.client;
> use item_cls, apq, apq.postgresql, apq.postgresql.client;
> 
> package item_dbm_cls is
>     type item_dbm is limited private;
>     function new_item_dbm(it_dbm: item_dbm) return item_dbm;
> 
> private
>     type item_dbm is record
>         it: item;
>         connection: connection_type;
>     end record;
> 
> end item_dbm_cls;

In addition to the other answer (the one suggesting a procedure) let me ask
you a question:

The full private view of item_dbm is non limited so why did you make the
partial public view limited?

With Regards

Martin
-- 
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
http://www.ada.krischik.com