From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,a86f1b04a0a258b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a86f1b04a0a258b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Michael Stark <mstark@cs.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: UML & Ada
Date: 1998/06/17
Message-ID: <35880034.68F8@cs.umd.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 363582671
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <35868F4A.FC463980@email.mot.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-User: mstark
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.object
Date: 1998-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dennis Miller wrote:
> 
> Although Ada is considered an object-based language (not including Ada
> 95) as opposed to a OO language, is it possible to construct code in Ada

But Ada 95 _is_ Ada, just as FORTRAN 77 superceded previous versions
of FORTRAN to become _the_ standard.  Given this, I see no reason that
you can't use UML with Ada, unless you are dealing with Ada 83 legacy
code, in which case the answer is a resounding "it depends" ;)


> from UML notation and vice versa?  Better yet, is it possible to get a
> high level of functionality from an OO notation system and implementing
> it with a object-based language?
> 
> Dennis Miller

Mike
-- 
Michael Stark
Goddard Research & Study Fellow
University of Maryland, College Park
e-mail: mstark@cs.umd.edu
phone: (301) 405-2721
"Soccer is life -- the rest is just details"  (GO USA!!!)