From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,a86f1b04a0a258b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,a86f1b04a0a258b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Pierre DISSAUX Subject: Re: UML & Ada Date: 1998/06/17 Message-ID: <3587C940.4BA2@tni.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 363516764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <35868F4A.FC463980@email.mot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: TNI http://www.tni.fr/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: pierre.dissaux@tni.fr Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.object Date: 1998-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Dennis Miller wrote: > > Although Ada is considered an object-based language (not including Ada > 95) as opposed to a OO language, is it possible to construct code in Ada > from UML notation and vice versa? Better yet, is it possible to get a > high level of functionality from an OO notation system and implementing > it with a object-based language? > > Dennis Miller HOOD (Hierarchical Object Oriented Design) method provides high level constructs that can be easily translated into Ada code. Last version of the method (HOOD4) is closer to Ada95 and C++, but remains fully compatible with Ada83 and C. For further details: http://www.hood.be/ ----------------------- Pierre Dissaux TNI