From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ncar!ames!elroy!jpl-devvax!rich
From: rich@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Criticism of Ada
Message-ID: <3582@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Date: 23 Nov 88 16:42:17 GMT
References: <881121144228.1a27@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Reply-To: rich@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit)
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <881121144228.1a27@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV> larry@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV writes:
>Can we all agree not to waste time and space on the recent attack on Ada 
>posted from the C++ news group?  None of the points are new, several are 
>.......

But this is the first good discussion I've seen on this group in months.....
Call it "constructive arguing".

Rich
-- 
rich@jpl-devvax.Jpl.Nasa.Gov