From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b4c0f0f8a3cf7068
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a146,7bdd56c6db71678c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public
From: "Norman H. Cohen" <ncohen@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Hotspot. Dynamic compilers "better" than static one?
Date: 1998/06/05
Message-ID: <35780CE5.1B6D@watson.ibm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 359853193
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6kocc1$d80@drn.newsguy.com> <6kpk0h$qmo$1@supernews.com>
 <3572FDA2.22E1@watson.ibm.com> <3576007B.FC0E0827@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com
To: John Volan <johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-06-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


John Volan wrote:

> Norman H. Cohen wrote:
> >
> > (Translation into Java:  Suppose there is a class T with method p and
> > final subclasses T1, T2, T3, ....  If we know that most of the calls on
...
> 
> Doesn't that presume that T1 is a "final" class (i.e., a leaf on the
> inheritance tree, with no further subclasses allowed)? 
...
> 
> If I'm missing something here, I'd be grateful for a clarification.

Yeah, you're missing the first word on the second quoted line from my
post! :-)

-- 
Norman H. Cohen
mailto:ncohen@watson.ibm.com
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/n/ncohen