From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ee5611d3fbf05b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
Subject: Re: Enumeration literal visibility and use type
Date: 1998/05/27
Message-ID: <356C4D06.413FB3BC@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 357029524
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6kej65$dnh$1@hermes.seas.smu.edu> <m3btsk8xoa.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> The issue is that "use type" only gives you direct visibility to the
> predefined "operators" of a type; it does not give you direct visibility
  ^^^^^^^^^^ primitive
> to the predefined "operations" of a type.  Enumeration literals are
> operations, not operators, and so aren't made directly visible by "use
> type."