From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!m2c!wpi!wpi.wpi.edu!tfrancis
From: tfrancis@wpi.wpi.edu (Krishan M Nainani)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: The ADA Rendevous
Message-ID: <3567@wpi.wpi.edu>
Date: 17 Aug 89 22:57:13 GMT
Sender: tfrancis@wpi.wpi.edu
Reply-To: tfrancis@wpi.wpi.edu (Krishan M Nainani)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass.
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


[1mHi[m,

	I have a question about the Ada rendevous. 

	There are many tasks each with 1 entry and these tasks are scheduled
by calling a global scheduler from inside the entry call. So, initially any 
task is chosen and its entry is accepted and somewhere within the entry there 
is a call to the scheduler (which is global to these tasks). Next, the 
scheduler checks a data-structure which contains the varying importances of 
each task and then it executes that task's entry. This can be done.

But I am unsure as to how I can encode the following restriction which is 
illustrated in the following example:

	Task A was chosen to run and so it was entered at entry point AA.
Within the code of AA, there was a call to the scheduler which found that
task B is more important than task A and so task A should be suspended and
task B is entered at entry point BB. Within BB, there was a call to the 
scheduler which determined that task C (entry CC) should now run. Within CC,
it was found that task A (entry AA) is the most important and should be run 
now. HOWEVER, task A should be resumed at where it left off (i.e where it was
suspended). THIS IS THE PART THAT I DON'T KNOW HOW TO ENCODE IN ADA.
	This seems to involve manipulating the global task queue at runtime.
I doubt if I can do this in standard Ada but is it possible to accomplish 
this by interfacing to C (not Assembler) ? 

	[5;7mAnyone have any clues whatsoever?[m

Krishan Nainani	(tfrancis@wpi.wpi.edu)