From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,ea30c4e9c3d00b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea30c4e9c3d00b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Stephen Bull <sgb@praxis-cs.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ultimate Language feature list
Date: 1998/05/15
Message-ID: <355C28EA.F5BAC661@praxis-cs.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 353486147
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6jc18b$lug$1@news.eclipse.net> <355BCB54.1DAA@ozemail.com.au>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Praxis Critical Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1998-05-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Chris Miller wrote:

> I always understood that the "ultimate" language was, by
> definition, an
> interpreter for the English language !.
>

Ugh! I hope this was not a serious suggestion: natural language
is far too ambiguous to be a useful implementation language.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Stephen Bull  Praxis Critical Systems  20 Manvers Street  BATH
BA1 1PX  UK
               +1225 466991 (switchboard)  +1225 469006 (fax)
          Views expressed are not necessarily those of my
employer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------