From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c40a0b80792cad80
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Al Christians <achrist@easystreet.com>
Subject: Re: gnat and djgpp?
Date: 1998/04/12
Message-ID: <3531AA14.173@easystreet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 343506622
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <352c60a6.0@news.cadvision.com>
 <Er71tp.4s@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: achrist@easystreet.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Trillium Resources Corporation
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-04-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jerry van Dijk wrote:

> As a tempory solution (until a 2.8.x based public GNAT becomes available)

Should we be expecting a new version of GNAT or something like it for
DOS?
TIA for any info regarding lieklihood/what/when this might happen.

Al