From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2f8b28565f329871,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "B.Voh" <voh@young.epc.lmms.lmco.com>
Subject: local variables
Date: 1998/04/10
Message-ID: <352E491F.4C6D@young.epc.lmms.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 342796116
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Space Systems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-04-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Does new ADA support a retention of local variables similar to Fortran's
"save" or C's "static" declaration?
In my last encounter with ADA, some years back, I found that to be a
rather crippling ommission and often working against the very principles
(encapsulation) it was supposed to champion.