From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff5da2a756fded98 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Subject: Re: Forest 1.6 on Linux 2.1.92 failure... Date: 1998/04/05 Message-ID: <3527822b.0@news.integrityonline.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 341061379 References: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Organization: RAINet Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Tobias Edvardsson wrote in message ... >Hi! > >I'm trying to compile forest 1.6 on my Linux box (Kernel 2.1.92) using >GNAT 3.10p (GCC 2.8.1). Why don't you use florist, instead? Forest was an Ada83 binding, and gnat is adopting florist which is an ada95 binding. The URL is ftp://ftp.cs.fsu.edu/pub/PART/POSIX-DOT5/florist17Feb98.tar.gz Here's an excerpt from the README file: NORMAL INSTALLATION: We have only compiled and tested this version of Florist under Solaris 2.5.1. A slightly earlier version was tested on Slackware Linux with kernel 2.0 and HP-UX. Florist should be able to autoconfigure for those systems, though some changes have been made to the autoconfiguration mechanism since the last test for those systems. We have also done some work toward supporting other operating systems, including DEC UNIX. The Default autoconfiguration script is likely to work at least partially on most mainstream UNIX systems. You should see the "NOTES.*" files, for records of what we have done last on various systems. I think this is "the right direction." David C. Hoos, Sr.