From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c7a24d13241b98
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mark.bennison@gecm.com (Mark Bennison)
Subject: Re: Standadised OO Language
Date: 1998/02/12
Message-ID: <34e2e36d.1301004024@news.geccs.gecm.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 324419379
References: <34E2D3D9.B2F1F398@adelaide.on.net>
Organization: GEC Marconi Radar & Defence Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Matthew Daniel <matt@adelaide.on.net> thought long and hard and wrote:

>After Having a "discussion" with one of the engineers at work,  he is an
>Ada "hater" and I am the Ada "lover", about standadised OO languages, I
>said Ada95 was the only one, well at least 6 months ago, he said C++ has
>an ANSI standard and has for a couple of years.

Maybe he meant a draft ANSI standard. There's been one of them around
for a while. I believe that this C++ standard has recently been
ratified, but I don't have too many details. I'm sure some other kind
soul can enlighten you further.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Bennison MBCS,      +-----------------------------------+
Technical Consultant,    | All opinions expressed are my own |
EASAMS Software Systems. +-----------------------------------+
"Death is a fickle hen, and random are her eggs" - Armando Iannucci