From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,729bff287ce641cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-21 10:32:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jpwoodruff@irisinternet.net (John Woodruff) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: A personal view of SigAda Date: 21 Dec 2002 10:32:44 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <34defe4d.0212211032.16e5a436@posting.google.com> References: <36f61440.0212201345.74a04ba3@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.126.134.137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1040495564 5413 127.0.0.1 (21 Dec 2002 18:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Dec 2002 18:32:44 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32166 Date: 2002-12-21T18:32:44+00:00 List-Id: JeLlyFish.software@gmx.net (Vinzent Hoefler) wrote in message news:<36f61440.0212201345.74a04ba3@posting.google.com>... > > The keynote from Robert Carey of Livermore Labs was amazing - they > > are building a thing called the "National Ignition Facility" (NIF), > > which is basically one of the world's biggest lasers. > > Oh yes, the figures looked very impressive... > > > Oh, and when the shot fires, the whole thing is supposed > > to be synchronised to <20 _pico_seconds! Now that's what I call > > hard real-time! > > I still wonder how they will achieve that, especially on a relatively > large distributed system like this. I mean it basically requires more > accuracy than the CPU clock alone has... Here's a little clarification about the NIF's 20 picosecond timing precision: Of course, there is no computing taking place during the propagation of the laser pulse (which has duration 25 nanoseconds). The Integrated Computer Control System that Bob described sets up the experiment and then turns over control to a hardware timing system and that hardware distributes triggers to the 1500 or so instruments that refine and observe the pulse. "The Integrated Timing System uses fiber-optic communications and network technologies to distribute a time-encoded data stream throughout the facility; then generates independently controlled, real-time trigger pulses close to the device to be triggered." A report "The NIF Integrated Timing System - Design and Performance" by Dick Lerche et al was delivered at the ICALEPCS 2001 conference and is available at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C011127/TUAP069.shtml.