From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 100e77,4dc018f71a756798
X-Google-Attributes: gid100e77,public
X-Google-Thread: 111d6b,328622178ec8b832
X-Google-Attributes: gid111d6b,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8775b19e3c68a5dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,a03ae7f4e53958e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,a03ae7f4e53958e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,a03ae7f4e53958e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,328622178ec8b832
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,a03ae7f4e53958e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: jeff@jakfield.xu-netx.com (Jeff York)
Subject: Re: Philosophers
Date: 1998/02/02
Message-ID: <34d50cc3.23274618@news.u-net.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 321354707
References: <34a991f0.2379476@news.diac.com>
 <34cd2808.10685219@newsroom.tassie.net.au> <6ankdf$5h8@clarknet.clark.net>
 <34D1CE66.3B16@physiology.ucl.ac.uk> <6asp7r$8i3@clarknet.clark.net>
 <gTd7ERAUvm00EwN7@thequiff.demon.co.uk> <34d31f59.1398864666@news.u-net.com>
 <WZ8WWBARd800EwqB@thequiff.demon.co.uk>
Organization: (Posted Via) U-NET Ltd.
Reply-To: jeff@jakfield.xu-netx.com
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.java.misc,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.cobol,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.ada,alt.games.mornington.cresent
Date: 1998-02-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Martin Richardson <martinr@thequiff.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In article <34d31f59.1398864666@news.u-net.com>, Jeff York
>>>>>> >> Name a sport or game that doesn't have rules to it! I bet
>>>>>> >>you won't find one.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>Mornington Crescent
>>>
>>Not so..
>>
>>Mornington Crescent has rules.  It's just that nobody actually knows
>>what they are..  :)
>>
>That's because it's against the rules to know.

But if it's against the rules to know,  you have to know the rule to
know not to know the rules,  which is paradoxical..  

I think...  :)

--
Jeff.
jeff@jakfield.xu-netx.com  (remove the x..x round u-net for return address)

... There's pleasure sure in being mad
    That none but madmen know...
                               Dryden