From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1ee02783c13c3480
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Bob Lusk <bob_lusk@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: Object Ada (Aonix)
Date: 1998/03/01
Message-ID: <34FA2B79.FE54764@swbell.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 329894432
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <34E32C78.41C6@snv.jussieu.fr>
To: Dominique Bouthinon <Dominique.Bouthinon@snv.jussieu.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@nnrp3
X-Trace: (null) 888810633 13493 (None) 151.164.38.50
Organization: Southwestern Bell Internet Services, Richardson, TX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-03-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


My personal opinion:
Yes there are a number of bugs in ObjectAda.  At my workplace, we tried
using ObjectAda with limited success.  Support is slow in helping with
problems that surface.

If you have a reasonably small program, you may be successful.  If this
is new code and not reused Ada 83 code you have a better chance. 
Debugger is flawed - You may have to debug with print statements.

Have you considered either Rational or Green Hills?  Is your application
real-time?

Dominique Bouthinon wrote:
> 
> Are there known bugs in Object Ada (Aonix) ?
> 
> thanks
> 
> --
> Dominique Bouthinon
> Atelier de BioInformatique - Universite Paris VI
> 12, rue Cuvier 75005 PARIS (FRANCE)
> Email : Dominique.Bouthinon@snv.jussieu.fr
> fax   : 01 44 27 63 12