From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b85793c9263ca04
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: James Huckaby <jhuckaby@mps.lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: C++ to Ada Link Problems
Date: 1998/02/27
Message-ID: <34F6C44B.83BB7D6A@mps.lmtas.lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 329142074
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <34F472E7.D6B66CAB@mps.lmtas.lmco.com>
 <9802270246.AA28724@MERV.CS.NYU.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: James.B.Huckaby@LMCo.com
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Lockheed Martin - Tactical Aircraft Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> You will find that the problems of interfacing to C and C++ are FAR
> simpler using Ada 95 in general, and GNAT in particular. I suggest
> giving consideration to this alternative. Ada 83 systems tend to be
> notoriously difficult to interface to C++.

Well, I've been having a notoriously difficult time of it, but
I'm limited due to contracts and contractors.  I have to use
Ada 83.
 
''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''
James Huckaby                  mailto:James.B.Huckaby@LMCo.com
''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''
``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``''``