From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0e28886667436ea
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
Subject: Re: Task storage
Date: 1998/02/24
Message-ID: <34F32517.98F0E53F@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 328268103
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <34F30CB0.CD9@obs-vlfr.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Philippe Laval wrote:

> My Ada 95 application, compiled with Gnat 3.10 under Windows 95,
> recursively allocates large tasks (about 1_000 instructions).
> Storage_Error is raised after only a few ten tasks are created, despite
> the 40 Mbytes available on my machine. I need about 12 Kbytes of stack
> per task. The default storage pool is obviously too small. I would like
> to set up a user defined pool object, according to the chapter 13.11 of
> the ALRM, but the examples given make not very clear how Allocate could
> be overridden to reserve 12 Kbytes each time "new" is executed. Where
> can I find some examples which could be adapted to solve my problem?

You probably don't need a non-default storage pool to solve this problem. Just
put a pragma Storage_Size(12_000); in your task spec and see what happens.