From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,409d3c67c89c6b67 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Stephen Leake Subject: Re: PARAMETER MISMATCH Date: 1998/02/17 Message-ID: <34EA06EA.203B@gsfc.nasa.gov>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 325999829 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <34E9D6D3.6396@er.uqma.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: jj091849@er.uqma.ca wrote: I remember enough high school french to understand your post; hope you can understand my response! > = > Bonjour j'ai une petit programme qui a une erreur de > parameter mismatch =E0 la lige 49 > getelem (elem,s_elem,aut_elem,ref_elem :OUT string); you are calling "getelem" with only 4 parameters; you declare it with six parameters: > = > PROCEDURE getelem (ka: In natural; > str1 :In string; > elem,s_elem,aut_elem,ref_elem :OUT string) IS One way to get better error messages from the compiler (at least with GNAT and ObjectAda) is to use named parameter calls: getelem = (elem =3D> elem, s_elem =3D> s_elem, aut_elem =3D> aut_elem, ref_elem =3D> ref_elem); then the compiler will give an error message listing the missing parameters. -- = - Stephe