From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d0b5af12e09c9d4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Lionel Draghi <LioDraghi@FILNET.FR>
Subject: Re: HTML as GNAT source
Date: 1998/02/06
Message-ID: <34DB8D82.67CF8DC1@filnet.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 322835025
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <9802052300.AA14439@nile.gnat.com>
Comments: cc: rleif@rleif.com, chat@gnat.com, eachus@mitre.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> <<It's only a dream, but reality is not so far. hTML is a simple and
> widely
> used technology, so for others tools involved in the developpment
> process, there is no real problem. No doubt that Robert's initiative
> regarding Ada code will be successfull, but an immediate first step
> could be to process html markers in Ada comment. I think this will
> cause compiler no special problem.
> What we only need is an elisp gourou to merge Ada and html mode :-)
>
> >>
>
> What does it mean to "process html markers in Ada comment[s]".
> Ada comments allow completely arbitrary character sequences, so
> I am not sure what you are asking for here.

Ok, you confirm that there his no possible compiler problem
due to exotic comments (considering only Ada95 compiler,
naturlich :-).

What i am asking for is exactly the Ada-mode, plus the ability to
manage few html markers in comments, those allowing to jump to
other documents (why not only hREF?).

Lionel.