From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ba2c58c9617ec74,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Strip vs. DLL
Date: 1998/02/05
Message-ID: <34DA2003.7685@gsfc.nasa.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 322412379
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <34D6B16E.281C1437@srv.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-02-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Paul Whittington wrote:
> 
> Having finally figured out how to build a DLL using GNAT 3.10p1
> I now have a new problem.
> 
> When I run strip on a DLL that works fine it seems to remove the
> exported routine names along with all the debug information.  No
> matter what strip switches I use this happens.
> 
> Is there a way to strip a DLL without also stripping the ability to
> use exported routines by name?

I don't have a direct answer, but if the purpose of using 'strip' is to
remove debugging information, you could always recompile without -g.
This is one reason to have a "release build" as well as a "debug build"
makefile.

> 
> --
> Paul Whittington
> Whittington Engineering
> 260 South Woodruff Avenue
> Suite 201
> Idaho Falls, ID 83401
> paul@srv.net
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>                            Name: smime.p7s
>          Part 1.2          Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>                        Encoding: base64
>                     Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
- Stephe