From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8963682ce4cab241
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: GNAT Limitations?
Date: 1998/01/26
Message-ID: <34CCAD31.2E47@gsfc.nasa.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 319392749
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6aesm3$sr6$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <01bd296e$fad757c0$0e2915c0@p5120>
 <6aft7v$vos$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


wanker@exploited.barmy.army wrote:
> >2. Remove Ada.
> 
> The manual told me to use Ada.  So should I do (1) then ignore
> what it says?  After all I can't heed 1 & 2 at the same time.

2. with Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation;

For compatibility with Ada 83, "Unchecked_Deallocation" is declared both
in Standard (as a rename) and in Ada. To use the one in Ada, you need to
with it correctly.

> 
> If the LRM says one thing and GNAT is supposed to be a conforming
> Ada compiler, then it is a natural assumption to think that it
> would follow the Manual (or have the rules for reading manuals
> changed?).

GNAT is correct, and so is the manual. Keep asking questions; you'll
eventually get where you need to be :).

-- 
- Stephe