From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5c951389bb3174d3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mats Weber Subject: Re: Ada Debugger Date: 1998/01/26 Message-ID: <34CC8B41.9865D0D@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 319325080 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6abjnv$91s$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: ELCA Matrix SA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-01-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Before I start, I would like to say that I've browsed this > group, did searches in dejanews for old articles dealing > with this, did web searches, browsed the FAQs, and even > hopped over to the HBAP, and I could not find a satisfactory > answer to my question. Now I come crawling to you :) Look at the GNAT chat archive on . There are several discussions about gdb. > Has gdb improved? Yes. But you need the Adaized version of GDB if you want it to work well. Look at directories winnt and gdb on . You should have told use which system/compiler you are using.