From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e02731064e80d04 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Paul Whittington Subject: Re: Ada - State of the art tools... lacking Date: 1997/12/31 Message-ID: <34AABFCB.97CE3845@srv.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 311745652 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <01bd102d$fcfbb910$652da8c0@steved_home> <01bd108a$12194860$baeb649b@freeman> <01bd1274$01939f40$652da8c0@steved_home> <34A74195.46994669@srv.net> <68cv7j$hkn$1@peuplier.wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Organization: Whittington Engineering Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-12-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ok I give :) You're exactly correct! One big change in, what is it, 15 years; not bad. Some of the changes from Ada 83 to Ada 95 also broke programs, and that's one big change in 12 or so years. About the same record. My point is that Borland is not likely to change ObjectPascal in any significant way very ofter. TTFN Paul Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote: > Paul Whittington a �crit dans le message <34A74195.46994669@srv.net>... > >> If we wrote our code for Delphi, there > >> is no reason to think that Borland won't make major changes to the > language > >> next year that breaks our system. > > > >[...] > > I've used TurboPASCAL since 1.0 and Borland > >has NEVER done anything even close to what your talking about here. > Seems you forgot the move from version 3 to version 4. > I still have an old version 3 on my computer because of an old application > that I never took the time to convert (would have involved a major > rewriting). -- Paul Whittington Whittington Engineering 260 South Woodruff Avenue Suite 201 Idaho Falls, ID 83401 paul@srv.net