From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95b198768e6c3970,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Terry Devine <tdevine@mitre.org>
Subject: Protected vs. unprotected objects
Date: 1997/12/17
Message-ID: <34984B64.163C@mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 299142450
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: MITRE Corp.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: tdevine@mitre.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I'd like to be able to switch back and forth between protected and
unprotected objects to be able to experiment with protection at various
levels of a data structure.  However, if I read the LRM correctly, it
would require major trauma (e.g., object.routine <-> routine(object)) .
Does anyone have a good solution?

Terry Devine