From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71dcb452eafb5045
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Stanley R. Allen" <s_allen@hso.link.com>
Subject: Re: Ada enumerations
Date: 1997/12/11
Message-ID: <34908778.41C6@hso.link.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 297398660
References: <348EDDC9.794B@hso.link.com> <dewar.881792609@merv>
Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> <<what good reason can there be for
> allowing me to *specify* enumeration representations
> but denying me the ability to easily *query* them also?
> >>
> 
> This particular feature was requested in one of the revision requests,
> carefully discussed, and specifically rejected. 

What were the reasons for its rejection, or where can I
find the discussion that lead to its rejection?

-- 
Stanley Allen
mailto:s_allen@hso.link.com