From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,90121986704b5776
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c950,90121986704b5776
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c950,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: smread@NOSPAM.com (Steven Read)
Subject: Re: Your english sucks, mine is better.
Date: 1997/11/28
Message-ID: <347ed0d4.996773@news.linkny.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 293722521
References: <MPG.ee2636b141efc8b989781@news.idt.net>
 <65ab3u$v07$1@news.nyu.edu> <MPG.ee29e258b7bed66989783@news.idt.net>
 <65bo2c$d9l$1@news.nyu.edu> <MPG.ee3975cc4bc4c10989787@news.idt.net>
 <s1o4tTg#8GA.145@news2.ingr.com> <MPG.ee6332b1771bda798979e@news.idt.net>
 <65jhvv$h4s$5@route1.mdrf.france3.fr>
 <MPG.ee9073f90871bed9897ab@news.idt.net>
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.pascal.ansi-iso,comp.lang.pascal.misc
Date: 1997-11-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


On Fri, 28 Nov 1997 16:52:51 -0600, billg@jk.pst.com wrote:

>In article <65jhvv$h4s$5@route1.mdrf.france3.fr>, boyd@france3.fr says...
>
>>     ... the epistemological anarchist has no compunction to defend the most
>>     trite, or the most outrageous statement. ... he may use reason,
>>     emotion, ridicule, an `attitude of serious concern' and whatever other
>>     means have been invented by humans to get the better of their fellow
>>     men.  His favourite pastime is to confuse rationalists ...  There is no
>>     view, however `absurd' or `immoral', he refuses to consider or to act
>>     upon, and no method is regarded as indispensable.
>> 
>>     -Paul K Feyerabend "Against Method"
>> 
>
>So now we have a start to the formal definition of unethical 
>employers/managers?
>
>billg


Have you ever thought about switching this subject over to 
the  _alt.bs.managment_   newsgroup?