From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Mark Wilden Subject: Re: Your english sucks, mine is better. Date: 1997/11/27 Message-ID: <347DEBB2.5B6A@mWilden.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 293243866 References: <34557f2b.1934172@news.mindspring.com> <347C92F0.152B@mWilden.com> <65k6jg$e6b$2@NNTP.MsState.Edu> Organization: The Mark Wilden Company Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1997-11-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Billy Chambless wrote: > > The goals don't have to be all that opposed. Enlightened managers realise > that happy, fulfilled employees are much more productive. Enlightened > employees realise that success for the company *can* mean success for > them. (of course, the more enlightened management is, the more "success > for the company" equates to "success for the employee".) There has to be a balance between employee wages and owner profits. To at least some degree, if you increase one you must decrease the other. Both want slices from the same pie.