From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,23c85e456e18d6b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed01.chello.at!newsfeed02.chello.at!news.hispeed.ch.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <34755714.KzzKSQK0hV@linux1.krischik.com> From: Martin Krischik Subject: Re: The Computer Language Shootout Benchmarks Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:15:20 +0200 References: <1146609438.780280.217330@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1146668114.965364.116600@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: KNode/0.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@hispeed.ch Organization: hispeed.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.119.160 (80.218.119.160) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 19:00:05 +0200 X-Trace: ce7294458e195f57fd20523854 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4045 Date: 2006-05-03T18:15:20+02:00 List-Id: Matthew Heaney wrote: >> Because GNAT.[Dynamic_]HTable has been designed to be extremely >> efficient. > > And why do you assume that Ada.Containers.Hashed_Maps aren't also > designed to be extremely efficient? �Why would the designer do it any > other way? Well, when the code is finished we can have a container shootout as well. But for the main shootout it will be GNAT.HTable - it does the trick and it is there (won't increase out lines of code rating). Martin -- mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com